Data sourced from Dakota Private Markets, the private fund performance platform powered by Dakota. Learn More | Request Access
For this post, we consider an emerging manager as a GP raising Fund I - III. The label describes track record, not firm size or the experience of the people involved. A Fund I sponsor may have a team with decades of deal experience from a prior platform, but the new firm has no realized history of its own for an allocator to underwrite. That gap between the team’s résumé and the firm’s record is where most emerging manager diligence happens.
It also helps to separate emerging from small. Some emerging managers raise sizable first funds on the strength of a spin-out. Some small managers are on Fund V and are anything but new. Fund number is the cleaner screen, because it tells you how many complete cycles an allocator can actually observe.
Allocators treat emerging managers as a different kind of risk, not just a smaller one. A mature GP gives you several funds of realized outcomes, so you can measure consistency across vintages and market conditions. A Fund I gives you one data point, and a Fund II gives you two, with the second often still early in its life. The first reading of an early IRR is therefore skeptical: how much of it is realized, how much is a mark, and how concentrated is it in a handful of positions?
That skepticism sits alongside a real reason to look. Emerging managers can offer focus, alignment, and access to strategies larger platforms have outgrown. Many institutions run dedicated emerging manager programs, and some consultants build whole mandates around them. A small GP with a sharp thesis can also move faster on a deal than a large platform can.
The practical result is that allocators will take the meeting on a strong early number, then spend most of the conversation testing whether it holds up. They compare the fund against its vintage peers instead of the full universe, because a 2021 fund and a 2019 fund face different markets. They look at DPI, because cash returned is the one figure a GP cannot mark. And they ask what the team did before, since a first fund is often a bet on people more than on a firm. IRR opens the door. DPI, portfolio construction, and team continuity decide whether the commitment happens.
Below are three funds from emerging managers that have posted top quartile IRRs (according to their peers in Dakota Private Markets)
Cloud Capital is a data center specialist. It was established in 2020 as the investment management affiliate of data center operator CloudHQ. Fund II acquires and develops hyperscale and AI-focused data centers in the US. The strategy is tenant-led and de-risked, built around demand for digital infrastructure. The fund closed oversubscribed in September 2025, with investors including US public and corporate pensions, asset managers, and family offices across North America, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific.
3 Boomerang is a Greenwich, Connecticut private equity firm that invests only in healthcare. It was founded in 2023 and targets lower middle market companies in North America and Western Europe with EBITDA of $4 million to $14 million. Its focus areas are biopharma outsourcing, medical device and diagnostic manufacturing, healthcare IT and tech-enabled services, and alternate site care. The firm was founded by Adam Dolder, a healthcare investor, and Adam Elberg, a healthcare entrepreneur. That pairing of investing and operating experience is the core of its pitch. Fund I closed above its $350 million target at more than $375 million and has shown
Ladera is an Austin-based real estate manager that invests in apartment properties. It targets multifamily assets in select, high-growth Sun Belt markets and adds value through better operations, repositioning, and targeted capital improvements. That is a classic value-add multifamily approach, where returns come from improving buildings instead of relying on market appreciation alone. Fund I began marketing in 2020. Ladera had raised its second multifamily fund by early 2023, when it also added a new chief investment officer.
For an emerging manager, a strong early IRR matters a great deal. With no long track record to point to, it is the first evidence a GP can put in front of an allocator, and it often decides whether Fund II gets a meeting at all. Funds that post strong early returns tend to raise the next fund faster, and the three above show how that can play out. The IRR earns the first look.
However, an early number is only a starting point. It is important to track these managers closely over time and see whether the results hold. Consistency across funds, vintages, and market conditions is what separates a manager with a repeatable process from one that had a strong start. That means watching how IRR settles as the fund matures, whether DPI begins to confirm it, and how each follow-on fund compares with the one before.
These three funds are a starting point. Dakota Private Markets lets you screen early-fund performance by vintage, strategy, and peer quartile, so you can build your own watch list and test every number before it reaches an investment committee.
Request Access or book a demo to the performance metrics for these three funds, as well as 18,000+ more.
Disclaimer: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to invest in any fund or manager. The funds named are examples and are not endorsements.